Cross-Text Connections в SAT: как сравнить два текста

Text 1

When a city charges drivers a fee to enter its busiest district during peak hours, traffic in that district falls sharply. Economist Dario Fenn studied one such scheme and found that average trip times inside the zone dropped by nearly a fifth within a year. He concludes that congestion pricing is the most reliable tool available to planners for easing gridlock in dense urban cores.

Text 2

Fenn's district-level numbers are real, but they capture only part of the picture. Transport analyst Mira Kohl notes that many drivers priced out of the charged zone simply reroute onto surrounding residential streets, where congestion and pollution then worsen for other neighborhoods. The overall benefit, she argues, depends heavily on whether a city pairs the fee with better public transit along those displaced routes.

Based on the texts, how would Mira Kohl most likely respond to Fenn's conclusion in Text 1?

1. ABy conceding that the drop Fenn measured inside the zone may secure a citywide gain without transit
2. BBy noting that the drop Fenn measured inside the zone may be offset by worse nearby traffic
3. CBy warning that the drop Fenn measured inside the zone may mask pollution climbing within the district itself
4. DBy granting that the drop Fenn measured inside the zone may capture how much drivers valued their time

Text 1

Auroras glow when particles from the solar wind funnel along Earth's magnetic field lines and collide with gases high in the upper atmosphere. Petrov emphasizes the magnetic field's role as the single decisive factor. Without it, he argues, the incoming particles would simply scatter away uselessly into space, and the shimmering curtains of colored light could never begin to take shape at all.

Text 2

Nakamura instead investigates why a given aurora shines red, green, or violet rather than some other color. In her account, the magnetic field merely delivers the particles to the atmosphere; the specific colors themselves depend entirely on which gas is struck and at what altitude, since oxygen and nitrogen each release light of a distinct characteristic hue when energized.

Which choice best describes a difference in how the author of Text 1 and the author of Text 2 view what determines an aurora's appearance?

1. AWhile the author of Text 1 finds the magnetic field decisive, the author of Text 2 finds it merely a carrier
2. BWhile the author of Text 1 finds the struck gas decisive, the author of Text 2 finds it merely a backdrop
3. CWhile the author of Text 1 finds the solar wind decisive, the author of Text 2 finds it merely incidental
4. DWhile the author of Text 1 finds the impact altitude decisive, the author of Text 2 finds it merely secondary

Text 1

A cuttlefish can transform its skin to blend into gravel, sand, or weed within seconds. Halvorsen contends that the animal keys on local contrast: it inspects the light and dark edges directly beneath it and reproduces a matching pattern of blotches. Move the same cuttlefish onto a plain background, he reports, and the bold pattern collapses, because the sharp edges that triggered it are gone.

Text 2

Deng questions the focus on edges. In her trials, the strongest predictor of a cuttlefish's display was the size of nearby light and dark objects relative to the animal's own body, not the crispness of any single edge. Large pale patches and small dark specks drew different responses. Yet she agrees the animal is reading its surroundings by eye; a blinded cuttlefish, she notes, settles into one uniform tone regardless of the floor beneath it.

Based on the texts, both Halvorsen and Deng would most likely agree with which statement about cuttlefish camouflage?

1. AA cuttlefish scales its pattern to the size of nearby objects.
2. BA cuttlefish drops its pattern when it sees nothing to copy.
3. CA cuttlefish keeps its pattern fixed once it settles on a background.
4. DA cuttlefish builds its pattern from the sharp edges beneath it.